Quantcast
 

California Cracking Down on Pot Clubs High on Profits

Wed, 08/27/2008 - 9:03am by LibertySugar
412 Views - 29 comments

He may have been Governor Moonbeam in the '70s, but today California Attorney General Jerry Brown has cracked down on the state's pot clubs. When California legalized medical marijuana 10 years ago, medical dispensaries started popping up, only to see profits as high as a kite.

AG Brown said, "The voters wanted medical marijuana dispensaries to be used for seriously ill patients and their caregivers — not as million-dollar businesses."

Brown may be correct, but couldn't he apply his logic to other pharmaceutical companies? Pot wouldn't be the first drug to help businesspeople get rich. Even so, Brown has a new set of rules for these medical dispensaries. To see what they are, read more.

According to the SF Chronicle they include: Sell only to legitimate patients; operate as nonprofits; and only buy pot from fellow cooperative members at prices that cover cost, as opposed to professional growers who are out for big bucks. Though, of course, these medical providers can always get caught by the federal government, which doesn't recognize California's legalization. Is Brown right? Is pot as medicine OK as long as it's not an issue of profit?

Source

on Yahoo!

Related Citizen Stories

Related Network Stories


 
 
 

29 Comments Add a Comment

  • Michelin's picture
    Michelin
    1

    No, he's wrong. Marijuana is fine as medicine even if people are making a profit.

    19 weeks 5 hours ago Report Comment
  • MarinerMandy's picture
    MarinerMandy
    2

    Oh please, this is the only area that the government has any semblance of control over in this war on drugs so they keep going after it any way they can. Even recreation use is exponentially less harmful than any other illegal drug, and many legal drugs including alcohol and nicotine. Just makes me mad that they spend so much effort going after medical marijuana when there are far more serious problems to be dealing with.

    19 weeks 4 hours ago Report Comment
  • MartiniLush's picture
    MartiniLush
    3

    Agreed, Mitch and MarinerMandy! This seems like a waste of resources to me.

    19 weeks 4 hours ago Report Comment
  • poissondujour's picture
    poissondujour
    4

    It's a double-standard. If he's holding that they shouldn't be making profits, why doesn't that apply to companies like Pfizer?

    19 weeks 4 hours ago Report Comment
  • Jude C's picture
    Jude C
    5

    EXACTLY to all three of you.

    It would also be so much better for state revenues if, instead of demonizing something far less harmful than certain legal substances, and wasting valuable resources--including manpower--going after it, they would simply legitimize it and tax it like anything else.

    19 weeks 4 hours ago Report Comment
  • MartiniLush's picture
    MartiniLush
    6

    Or think if CA did with pot what WA did with liquor...it is under the control of the state, so the state gets all the proceeds (all hard liquor stores in WA are state liquor stores). That could totally make up for the budget short-fall in CA we keep hearing about! What ever happened with the state worker's salaries, btw - did they really cut them, like the governor wanted to???

    19 weeks 4 hours ago Report Comment
  • hypnoticmix's picture
    hypnoticmix
    7

    Humbolt County Ca. is definitely the most pot friendly county in the state and maybe even the country. I heard an authority say and I quote "as long as you don't have more than fifty on your property they shouldn't bother you".

    19 weeks 4 hours ago Report Comment
  • UnDave35's picture
    UnDave35
    9

    So we're going to provide this drug per a doctor's advice, but I'm not allowed to make money on it?? Welcome to socialism??

    19 weeks 2 hours ago Report Comment
  • milosmommy's picture
    milosmommy
    10

    Agree to all. I was discussing with my husband the other day as to why the goverment doesn't legalize it, regulate it and tax it like tobacco. While he's for it he brought up a good point. It would be way too difficult because its so easy for just anybody to grow because it's essentially a weed. Where as tobacco isn't an easy crop so not anyone can grow it.

    19 weeks 1 hour ago Report Comment
  • UnDave35's picture
    UnDave35
    12

    Do you think they would mind if I started growing some weeds in my back yard, to sell to the medical industry? I could always stand to make a little more money.

    19 weeks 1 hour ago Report Comment
  • MartiniLush's picture
    MartiniLush
    14

    Only as long as you don't make a profit off it, UnDave (or enough of a profit for them to notice!) Eye-wink Because, obviously, profiting is bad....

    19 weeks 1 hour ago Report Comment
  • milosmommy's picture
    milosmommy
    21

    My ex's dad used to hide it in tomato plants works pretty well actually.

    19 weeks 22 min ago Report Comment
  • bluesarahlou's picture
    bluesarahlou
    22

    My parents had a small greenhouse for their plants when I was younger. One of my only memories of that house (aside from all the goats we had Smiling ) was wondering why we had a special, separate greenhouse for the tomato plants (since they look pretty similar). Flash forward 20 years and it all becomes clear!!

    19 weeks 17 min ago Report Comment
  • bluesarahlou's picture
    bluesarahlou
    23

    Side note-the guy in the picture is gonna have a helluva time getting the smell off him.

    19 weeks 17 min ago Report Comment
  • ilanac13's picture
    ilanac13
    26

    i just think that trying to control the level of profit that's being made is unreasonable. if you think about it - drug companies are able to patent drugs for up to 10 years and they can therefor control the profits that they make until they have to release the patent and other companies can make generic. i'm just not sure that it's something that can really be controlled even if you issue revised rules and regulations for it all.

    18 weeks 6 days ago Report Comment
  • UnDave35's picture
    UnDave35
    27

    I agree. If something is legal, you can't keep someone from making a profit on it.

    18 weeks 6 days ago Report Comment
  • amybdk's picture
    amybdk
    28

    So.... is there a generic drug available for marijuana?! hee hee

    18 weeks 6 days ago Report Comment
  • omilawd's picture
    omilawd
    29

    If marijuana used for medicinal purpose shouldn't be sold for profit, than neither should any other drugs. The pharmaceutical companies are the real thieves.

    18 weeks 6 days ago Report Comment

Leave a Comment

To post comments, please log in or register.



Morsels of goodness, delivered daily.

Enter your email below: