Quantcast
 

Medical Marijuana Law Limited in California

Tue, 11/25/2008 - 3:00am by LibertySugar
221 Views - 15 comments

The California Supreme Court clarified the state's medical marijuana law yesterday, deciding unanimously that individual suppliers can be prosecuted even when dealing to patients with doctor approval. Sellers, who are not caretakers, or fellow medical marijuana cooperative members, will not be protected from the law.

Patients will most likely turn exclusively to marijuana collectives and cooperatives to get their fill. Opponents of the decision say that centralizing the source of the drug makes it much easier for federal agents to raid such dispensaries.

In 1996 California voters passed Proposition 215, which approved marijuana cultivation and use by those with doctor approval. But earlier this year, the state's high court ruled that companies could fire employees who test positive for marijuana, even if they had a doctor's recommendation.

Do you think the trend toward narrowing the legal use of medical marijuana puts the intentions of California voters up in smoke?

Source

on Yahoo!

Related Ido Stories

Related Network Stories


 
 
 

15 Comments Add a Comment

  • em1282's picture
    em1282
    1

    "Be careful, California, you're supposed to be the crazy state – out there, the wild ones. Soon everybody will be saying, "Come down to the library, we'll have a wild time!" "Don't know where that book could be, mate...there's a lot of 'em about!""--Eddie Izzard

    6 weeks 1 day ago Report Comment
  • Mykie7's picture
    Mykie7
    2

    Utterly and completely without a doubt the most RIDICULOUS thing ever to prosecute marijuana use. Let's start prosecuting drinkers and cigarette smokers too!

    I still stand by my opinion that if they would de-criminalize it and tax it instead of outlawing it, there would many fewer problems.

    6 weeks 1 day ago Report Comment
  • GKitty's picture
    GKitty
    3

    It's like "don't ask don't tell". The Clubs are every where but the feds come in from time to time to close them down. I don't know what's going on!

    6 weeks 1 day ago Report Comment
  • Jude C's picture
    Jude C
    5

    What a waste of law enforcement resources.

    Mykie, I agree.

    6 weeks 1 day ago Report Comment
  • hypnoticmix's picture
    hypnoticmix
    6

    I have no problem with limiting the sales through dispensaries and cooperatives. However, this business of saying o.k. you can smoke if you have a Dr. permission but you can also be fired makes me scratch a balk spot on my head. As my Daddy used to say "what kind of $#!+ is this".

    6 weeks 1 day ago Report Comment
  • skb9850's picture
    skb9850
    12

    Hypno, that's exactly what caught my attention as I read the article. What good is having a doctor's perscription if you can still get fired?

    6 weeks 1 day ago Report Comment
  • jueycruiser's picture
    jueycruiser
    14

    i dont understand why its still illegal. does anybody actually think it is some kind of danger to society? all i hear about on the news anymore is how tight the city budget is, wouldnt it be better to just legalize it, and save police, jail space, etc. and make some tax revenue?

    6 weeks 22 hours ago Report Comment
  • Mykie7's picture
    Mykie7
    15

    juey! True story

    Of course, that makes SENSE so it will never happen.

    6 weeks 11 hours ago Report Comment

Leave a Comment

To post comments, please log in or register.



Morsels of goodness, delivered daily.

Enter your email below:
 
 
 
 
 
 











©1976-2009 Sugar Inc. | Privacy (updated July-4-2008) | Terms of Use | Copyright Policy | Advertise | Contact Us